Group photo
NUMD97's Photo NUMD97 Posts: 10,115
12/25/18 9:01 P

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
We just had a similar discussion about The Times' own history of anti-Semitism. And the argument was, "That was then, this is now." Apparently, little has changed.

Real surprised to read about Walker. I had no idea.

Knowing is not enough. We must apply. Willing is not enough. We must do.
~ Goethe

Dare to dream.
~ Me

 Pounds lost: 0.3 
ECOAGE's Photo ECOAGE Posts: 12,831
12/25/18 5:47 P

Community Team Member

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Obviously, there is a lot that can be discussed when looking for understanding of the Talmud. We all know some people truly accept each word as literal word-for-word gospel (sorry, I couldn't resist!) ... well, a literal interpretation: Rebecca was three years old when she chose to marry Isaac.

It takes a long time to grow young. - P. Picasso

~~~SparkTeam Leader ~~~
~ Virtual Walk/Run/Cycle Team
~ Four Seasons Challenge
~ Calling All Vegetarians and Vegans

 January Minutes: 321
PHEBESS's Photo PHEBESS Posts: 45,168
12/25/18 4:22 P

Community Team Member

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Another wow.

You would think, at the very least, that the NY Times would have printed some kind of statement with Alice Walker's column that said something like "The views of the author are not the views of this newspaper" - some sort of disclaimer, I guess.

And I'm appalled by Alice Walker's views, it this review of her review is true. Who is forcing her to read the Talmud? Where does anyone say that 3 yr old girls can be married?? Where is this misinformation and hatred coming from???? Okay, that's me being rhetorical - but seriously, all her poetry and this article are doing is spreading hatred and prejudice. And you'd think someone who has lived with bigotry and hate all her life would be careful with her own viewpoints.

"Dance as if no one is watching."

 Pounds lost: 45.0 
GWYNANNE1's Photo GWYNANNE1 Posts: 4,223
12/25/18 6:55 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
wow. a lot to take in. I need a lot of time to "digest" this -- meaning I need time to think about how awful this is

BOSS61's Photo BOSS61 Posts: 6,657
12/25/18 6:37 A

My SparkPage
Send Private Message
Richard Cohen, a Washington Post columnist, takes the book review editor of the NYT to task on missing blatant antisemitism. In my view, Trump and his cronies continue to give new voice to antisemitic thoughts, words, and in this case, seemingly NYT publications. Here it is, copy-and-pasted for you:


Over the centuries, anti-Semitism has been many things — a religious conviction, an ideology, a national ethic, an unadorned expression of hate and, in more recent times, evidence of sturdy insanity. Now thanks to a New York Times interview with Alice Walker, it’s been reduced to merely a point of view. To cite the Times’s own motto, this interview was definitely not “news that’s fit to print.”

Walker, of course, is a highly praised novelist best known for “The Color Purple,” for which she won a Pulitzer Prize. Her renown is great, and it was no doubt on this basis that the Times interviewed her for its “By the Book” feature that runs in the Sunday Book Review. The trouble started with the first question.

“What books are on your nightstand?” the Times asked. The second book Walker named was “And the Truth Shall Set You Free” by the British conspiracy theorist David Icke. The book is so repellently anti-Semitic that Icke’s usual publisher wouldn’t touch it. Among other things, it endorses that hoary anti-Semitic forgery “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” which blames evil Jews for much of the world’s ills. The book also suggests that schools ought to balance lessons on the Holocaust with some questioning whether it ever even happened, and it reveals that the world is run by a cabal of giant, shape-shifting lizards, many of whom just happen to be Jewish.

Times readers howled. The paper should have flagged the book as an anti-Semitic tome, they insisted. The Times disagreed. It doesn’t do that sort of thing in its “By the Book” feature. In the Times’s response, the paper conceded that Icke “has been accused of anti-Semitism,” a bit like conceding that David Duke has been accused of racism. Walker, who last year posted the poem “It Is Our (Frightful) Duty To Study The Talmud” on her blog, is beyond mere accusation. She’s the genuine anti-Semitic article. Apparently informed by her odd reading of the ancient Jewish text, Walker’s 2017 poem asked some questions: “Are Goyim (us) meant to be slaves of Jews?” “Are three year old (and a day) girls eligible for marriage and intercourse? Are young boys fair game for rape?”

In its response, the book review editor, Pamela Paul, submitted to some questions, one of which was why the Times did not ask Walker to account for her odd literary taste. “We never question people on their choices,” Paul said. A sentence later, she added, “The people’s answers are a reflection of their opinions, tastes and judgment.” In other words, anti-Semitism is just another opinion, taste or judgment.

Paul went on in that vein, saying that the Review has been down this road before. “We’ve also faced criticism when a writer only named white authors, or male authors. My response to that is the same as in this case: Does that answer tell you something about the subject? I think it does.” But it doesn’t. For some reason, my book group — wearily stuck on Jon Meacham, Michael Beschloss and Doris Kearns Goodwin — never got around to the Icke book. So, not having heard of Icke, I didn’t know that I was being informed that Walker cuddled up nightly with the rantings of a Jew hater. My bad, I suppose.

“Our readers are intelligent and discerning,” Paul added. “We trust them to sift through something which someone says in an interview, whether it’s the president or a musician or a person accused of sexual harassment, and to judge for themselves: Do I agree with this person?” Sexual harassment? The Holocaust? I guess they’re both bad.

In interviewing itself, the Times neglected to ask the Times (Paul) if it even knew that Walker was an anti-Semite. It might also have wondered if that might have caused the Times to feature someone else. After all, anti-Semitism has become something of a common leftist tic, especially among Israel haters, and has even polluted the leadership of the Women’s March. Walker is in that category. She will not even allow “The Color Purple” to be published in Hebrew.

The tone of Paul’s response is appalling. She surely does not mean to, but she manages to treat anti-Semitism as just another point of view — not a hatred with a unique and appalling pedigree that has led to unending slaughter, including the murder of 6 million, pogroms in Kielce in Poland (1946), York in England (1190) and the lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia (1915). What’s lacking from the Times is appropriate shock at Alice Walker’s bigotry and its own refusal to admit a mistake. An apology would be fit to print.

"Some day we will look back on this, and it will all seem funny" - Bruce Springsteen (The real BOSS, as opposed to me.)

 Pounds lost: 18.0 
Page: 1 of (1)  

Report Innappropriate Post

Other SparkJews General Team Discussion Forum Posts

Last Post:
12/31/2018 8:20:32 PM
2/15/2019 5:41:49 AM

Thread URL:

Review our Community Guidelines